Okay, The Google Glass Lady Needs To Zip It

Initially, I didn’t think someone wearing Google Glass into a San Francisco bar was that horrible. Maybe a little too aggressively tech for some aggressively hip San Franciscans, but whatever. I don’t hang out in either tech or punk rock places.

Actually, the real reason I felt for this woman was because I assumed the backlash towards her glasses wasn’t about an invasion of privacy. People take iPhotos in bars all the time. Rather, I assumed folks were angry at her $1500 video goggles, which are neither attractive nor serve any purpose. Sometimes, I use a $1000 handbag. It was a gift! And I don’t want anyone to beat me up over it. You probably have one nice thing too, right? You’re allowed to have a nice thing! It doesn’t make you a shitty person!

Occasionally I worry that San Francisco is becoming a place where anyone with a nice car or fancy shoes is no longer welcome, and because I like (yet sadly do not own) nice cars and shoes, I’m afraid someone will think I’m a shitty person.

But in following this Google Glass Lady story, I realize that the backlash, which seems to only be growing, is not because of $1500 glasses. But because the wearer of them is indeed acting like a shitty person.

Maybe she’s not really shitty deep down. But she is acting shitty.

If I were a crisis management PR type person, I would have advised Google Glass Lady (GGL) to offer up something like, “Wow, what a response! While I still don’t think its appropriate to attack or rob anyone, I do realize that maybe it’s time for more of a discussion on rights to privacy and rights to utilize new technology as it develops. I bet there’s space in San Francisco (and the world) for us all, and while I definitely want my purse back, I promise to take more consideration when wearing Google Glass in future. This experience has sure been an eye (glass) opener.”

And then I would tell her to shut up about it.

But Google Glass Lady did not come to me for advice. Weird.

Instead, she is posting every single article about her to her Facebook page. She is responding to every single post about her on, like, the entire internet. She continues to remain indignant and unwilling to give just the slightest bit. Plus, she manages to @GoogleGlass and #GoogleGlass every single comment or post she leaves. She hashtags everything! This makes it look like GGL can’t stop marketing, attack or no attack. You don’t really need to hashtag filing a police report.

Check out her back and forth Facebook posts with San Francisco comedian and activist Nato Green, who is definitely to the political left of everyone and also a nice and normal person of whom I am a big fan.

Nato linked to her Facebook page and opens up the discussion, eventually saying, “…as my grandmother used to say, manners can be fun. If I were in a bar and I thought people there were assholes, I would leave the bar. There are literally another five bars within a 2 block radius. There are assholes everywhere in a city and yet one must be civilized and learn how to navigate the choppy social waters of clashing cultures. You can choose to escalate with people being rude to you by shouting “I’m going to film you” or de-escalate by moving to another watering hole.”

Sarah says things like: “I was contacted by SFPD, have turned over information, and they are following up Google Glass #wearables #techhate #privacy #googleglass”

Thus making me agree, not with people who think it’s okay to rip a camera away from anyone, but with the fact that yeah, GGL is acting exactly like a caricature of exactly what many San Franciscans fear the most: ridiculously shitty behavior from well-paid tech people. If GGL had decided to be even remotely cool and “socially intelligent” about the whole experience, she could have gone a lot farther in bridging the gap between the techies and those who can’t stand them. Instead, GGL reinforces a stereotype that these people suck… and have really bad social skills.

Comments

  1. Russian Hill Street Blues says

    #techhate

    While I must reluctantly and embarrassingly admit that there is such a thing as #techhate, it’s generally carried out by the most myopic, reactionary and always-locked-and-loaded of my fellow citizens. Hashtagging her own posts with #techhate should raise an objection from the defense (or the prosecutioon — or whomever is calling this woman out for being the miserable hairdo that she is) about “facts not in evidence.”

    Talk about elevating your isolated incident into the stratosphere of public debate. And I thought — no, I know — that I was a self-important douchebag! Is this about #techhate, or is is it just about being an ill-mannered, thoughtless, irresponsible humble-braggart?

  2. says

    This whole time I’ve though the same thing – which is along the line of what Nato was saying. There are things you don’t do if you don’t want the inevitable outcome. You don’t go into a bar that has neither a website nor credit card swiping technology wearing the epitome of technology created by The Man. Just like you don’t wear your $1,000 handbag to divebars in the TL. It’s not that you’re setting yourself up for being a victim because no one deserves to be attacked. You are however drawing attention to yourself for reason that scream condescension to everyone who is not you. “Look at me! I’m representing something you can’t! I’m unabashedly rubbing your face in it! Just look. At. ME!”

    [Dare I call GGL’s appearance at that particular bar a “microaggression?”I might. But I’m not sure how I feel about the word “microaggression.”]

    I do think she should have had a reasonable expectation of confrontation and I’m not sure if she did.

    Full disclosure: I may be hypersensitive – there are a lot of things I don’t do and place I don’t go as both a black person and as girl. Because I expect confrontations or negative reactions. It’s just the way I was raised. I don’t feel comfortable being loud in public places or shopping in nice stores while wearing yoga pants. Yet GGL is surprised people took umbrage with google glass at Molotov’s??

    I don’t defend the assailant’s actions. Nor do I blame the victim. I do think her deliberately naive.

  3. Alex B-Z says

    I once narrowly avoided a cue ball in the eye for wearing a COLLARED SHIRT to Molotov’s. Simply because locals correctly surmised I ought to have known better.

    This has nothing to do with Google Glass and everything to do with not being a douche in Molotov’s.

  4. Tiffany says

    “This has nothing to do with Google Glass and everything to do with not being a douche in Molotov’s.” FTW

Trackbacks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>